Posted tagged ‘Bill O’Reilly’

To Greta; What might have really happend in the Casey Anthony Case

July 17, 2011

 
What really happened in the Casey Anthony Case?  The Full Story.
 
(This was returned from Bill O’Reilly as Unread.)
 
Bill O’Reilly, you are the biggest “PINHEAD” of them all,  concerning  the Casey Anthony trial.No, it is not  ”your job“  to educate all us “dummies” out here who don’t buy into your rants and rage, and demeaning of all the “stupid jurors.”  No, it is not your job to set yourself  up as prosecutor, judge and jury in this case, and hold your own TV trial.   No, it is not your job to incite people to mob rage in the streets, without just cause.Just because we do not have all the answers in this case, does not mean that someone should be executed based on some prosecutor’s conjecture (an opinion not founded on sufficient evidence;  a guess; a surmise.)

If one would hold their rage and tantrums long enough to t-h-I-n-k,   than (besides a mountain of other holes in the prosecutions testimonies,)  one might realize that Casey had no logical motive to murder her daughter, (no baby sitting problems, or whatever) nor was there any evidence in the case that she was not a good mother, but to the contrary.  There was nothing to show that Casey was in any kind of rut that would hinder her from going out and partying, finding a baby-sitter, or that she expressed to anyone that she felt tied down or burdened by her two year old daughter. The prosecutor’s theory and evidences did not hold up to logic, nor to any hard evidence, not even to any circumstantial logic.  There was reasonable doubt galore!  The prosecutor’s  story was made-up, without any realistic evidence to back it up.  Unfortunately, 2/3 of the people on the street grabbed it up hook-line-and-sinker, just because they are astonishingly judgmental, bloodthirsty, and taking no care to look at and consider the evidences.  A modern day lynch mob!

Now, following,  is a better theory, my own,  as to what might have actually happened, or could have happened.   When one applies some reason, they should be able to see that all the bases are covered, from beginning to end, and for-the-life-of-me, I can’t figure out why I seem to be the only one who can see this! ?  It is clear!   Is it not?

The defense presentation is  accurate, in that it was an accident gone bad, although  the defense  wisely chose to go only as far  –as to best show the jury that there was reasonable doubt abound–  in the story presented by the prosecution.   So the question is WHY?  What really happened?  Why was there a need to  cover up what really happened?

The story of the defense was that the child’s death was an accident gone bad, out of control, and that Casey’s father, George Anthony, proceeded to help cover it up.    So, why didn’t Casey just tell the truth?   Obviously, because Casey must have done something very stupid, such as using a little chloroform mixture to prompt her daughter Caley to sleep.   In so doing, Casey could have caused her daughter’s death, which would be considered murder by the authorities and the courts.

  Another theory, I heard a guest on the Geraldo TV show say, is that he thinks Casey had run out of gas, and went to get some gas, in a gas can, and had left Caylee in the car.  Evidently, the car got too hot and Casey took longer in getting the gas than she thought she would be.  That would explain about the gas can, discussed in the trial.  When Casey returned, and found Caylee dead, she panicked, –and I would say that then Casey put Calee’s dead body in the trunk of the car and drove home.  Casey’s father, George Anthony, found out what had happened, and then –he panicked also, or went out of his head.  He took Caylee, put her in a bag, and using his duck tape,  disposed of her the same way the family had disposed of it’s family pets.  Out of mad frenzy, he tossed the body in the swamp.  (Also, I even wonder if George himself might have been the father of Caylee?) 

Whatever happened, it was enough to cause George Anthony to want to commit suicide.   Obviously,  George Anthony, loved his grandchild very much, and must have been furious with Casey over this.   However; he proceeded to help Casey cover it up.   Obviously, it was not Casey who disposed of the body, –but George!  All the evidence points to George as being the one who ‘took care’ of the body.   Why was the body disposed of, with George’s duct tape, in the same way that George had always disposed of his family pets, with chloroform, a bag, and duct tape?  The true evidence shows that the duct tape was not placed over Caylee’s mouth and nose, as contended by the prosecution.  In reality, there was a piece of duct tape stuck to Caylee’s  hair, not her face, and had drooped down.  There was no DNA, or evidence of any facial tissue on the duct tape.  Also, the body had been moved around, and poked at by the meter reader who found it, over days.  There was also a piece of duct tape, on the ground further away from the body.  It is obvious, that duct tape was used to dispose of Caylee’s body, not to murder her.  (And even if the tape really had been used to sufficate this two year old little girl, why would the murderer leave it there, to clearly point that a murder had been commited?  And would it not be easier to just use a pillow?)

 Why was George, after the fact, contemplating suicide?   Now, it is easy to understand the anguish that was building up inside George, according to what he himself had done, to help cover-up for Casey, while at the same time loving his grand daughter so much.    (You can also observe his personal anguish, on the witness stand).  Of course, now that the trial is over; people will surely be taking a closer look at George Anthony, and his part in all of this.   Yes; it truly was an accident gone bad!   And yes; it truly is a dysfunctional family.     So Yes; Bill O’Reilly, –you are a “PINHEAD,” extraordinare! 

(PS: I am flabergasted at “Justice With Judge Jeanine.” How can a REAL Judge get away with the way she is behaving about this trial?  It seem like she should be disbarred!  I never saw a Judge behave so crazily, so wild and frenzied, disregarding and degrading the jurors, and our justice system.  She comes across like a wild beast with rabies, foaming at the mouth, with blood in her eyes, on the attack! It is really HARD to WATCH, and makes me a little sick.)  (gasp) –What if SHE had been the actual judge assigned to the Casey Anthony trial?  The thought of that REALLY makes me sick.) 

Thank God, we still have Greta, and Geraldo.

To O’Reilly and Hannity…

July 13, 2011

To O’Reilly and Hannity;

Just because a person works hard all their life, is no guarantee that they will never be in need.

Count your many blessings; name them one by one.

 

 

 

 

Donald Cole, Dover NJ

Now that the trial is over…

July 11, 2011

Now that the Casey Anthony trial is over, and cannot be retried in the courts, it is only logical that the reality to what really happened, will now be brought to light, proven and confirmed.  This is because exposing the truth, –that this was really a case of cover-up to very poor judgement, negligence, and stupidity,  a horrific accident which never should have happened, gone even worse– is more tolerable for the accused to bear, than  the likes of Bill O’Reilly. “Justice with Judge Jeanine,” and all the rest of those frenzied screamming pinheads and loonies out there, who have been spitting out venom 

When all this is over, I am sure that the media will not hesitate to replay this embarrassment to our society, and the respect and credibility of many TV celebrities and people who we once respected, will be greatly diminished;  a sad state of affairs, and very disappointing.   I thought we were better than that; what is our country coming to?

Bill O’Reilly has become a TV Talking “PINHEAD” –extraordinaire!

July 8, 2011

 

Bill O’Reilly has become a TV Talking “PINHEAD” –extraordinaire!
 
I strongly disagree with you that TV should be banned from the courtroom.  I did, pretty much, watch the entire trial.  If I had not watched the trial for myself, I would not be writing these comments.  Heaven forbid, that I would rely on Bill O’Reilly, or other TV celebrity talking heads, for my news and opinions.  I watch Bill O’Reilly all the time, but this time he was a real PINHEAD!  He should be ashamed of himself, and I do believe there will be some back-tracking, and a softer approach, if not an apology, coming.  Just look at what happened with those who listened to Bill O’Reilly, or those who share their opinions and emotions with his; look at all the crazy mobs out on the streets.  Does Bill O’Reilly want to identify with them, and stand in their midst?  I don’t think so.  It is not always wise to go with the polls, even if it does bring high ratings.  It might come back and bite you.  It is nothing more than  a lynch-mob mentality.

Bill O’Reilly, You are a “Pinhead”!

July 8, 2011

Bill O’Reilly, you are the biggest “PINHEAD” of them all,  concerning  the Casey Anthony trial.

No, it is not  “your job”  to educate all us “dummies” out here who don’t buy into your rants and rage, and demeaning of all the “stupid jurors.”  No, it is not your job to set yourself  up as prosecutor, judge and jury in this case, and hold your own TV trial.   No, it is not your job to incite people to mob rage in the streets, without just cause.

Just because we don’t have all the answers in this case, doesn’t mean that someone should be executed based on a prosecutor’s conjecture (an opinion not founded on sufficient evidence;  a guess; a surmise.)

If one would hold their rage and tantrums long enough to T-h-i-n-k,   than (besides a mountain of other holes in the prosecutions testimonies,)  one might realize that Casey had no logical motive to murder her daughter, nor was there any evidence in the case that she was not a good mother, but to the contrary.   The prosecutor theory and evidences did not hold up to logic, nor to any hard evidence.   There was reasonable doubt galore!

Now, following,  is my own theory as to what actually happened.   When one applys some reason, they should be able to see that all the bases are covered, from beginning to end, and for-the-life-of-me, I can’t figure out why I seem to be the only one who can see this! ?  It is clear!   Is it not?

The defense presentation is  accurate, in that it was an accident gone bad, although  the defense  wisely chose to go only as far  –as to best show the jury that there was reasonable doubt abound–  in the story presented by the prosecution.   So the question is WHY?  What really happened?

The story of the defense was that the child’s death was an accident gone bad, out of control, and that Casey’s father, George Anthony, proceeded to help cover it up.    So, why didn’t Casey just tell the truth?   Obviously, because Casey must have done something very stupid, such as using a little chloroform to prompt her daughter Caley to sleep.   In so doing, Casey caused her daughter’s death, which would be considered murder by the authorities and the courts.

  Obviously, Casey’s father, George Anthony, loved his grandchild very much, and must have been furious with Casey over this.   However; he proceeded to help Casey cover it up.   Obviously, it was not Casey who disposed of the body, –but George!  All the evidence points to George as being the one who ‘took care’ of the body.   Why was the body disposed of, with George’s duct tape, in the same way that George had always disposed of his family pets, with chloroform and duct tape?   Why was George, after the fact, contemplating suicide?   Now, it is easy to understand the anguish that was building up inside George, according to what he himself had done, to help cover-up for Casey, while at the same time loving his grand daughter so much.    (You can also observe his personal anguish, on the witness stand).  Of course, now that the trial is over; people will surely be taking a closer look at George Anthony, and his part in all of this.   Yes; it truly was an accident gone bad!   And yes; it truly is a dysfunctional family.     So Yes; Bill O’Reilly, —you are a “PINHEAD,” extraordinare!

Donald Cole, Dover NJ

Our Fascinating Frenzied Media

July 6, 2011

The Frenzied Media, in the Casey Anthony Trial,  and the like.  When you have closely followed a story, or actually know something about it, it is most always astonishing to see how the media in general covers it!  

Tabloid journalism seems to have spread to the major news networks!   All those talking heads carrying on about something they obviously know very little about, such as TV lady judges screaming out ,(so to speak)  ‘KILL HER ! KILL HER! –She’ IS Guilty! “”  –All based on unsubstantiated circumstantial evidence dreamed up by the prosecution, that doesn’t make sense, when you carry it through from beginning to end. 

  One really begins to see the true colors of people you once respected for their seemingly intelligence,  truth, and fairness.   I suspect that many of these celebrity talking heads are only getting their information through short snippets throughout the day, and it is especially obvious to those who have been closer to the story.   I was really shocked to hear the ranting of Bill O’Reilly, who I often watch, and have respected for so long.   I’m sure, that as time goes on, that there will be some backtracking and apologies made, to save face, –or maybe this country, the best there is, is really losing it.   (Or maybe, it’s just me in my old age.) 

Here is but one example, of many that could be pointed out,  about what I am saying:  I turn on my computer this morning, and the first thing that jumps out, (on AOL), is a photo of Casey Anthony smiling (“laughing”?) about the verdict, –taken COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT!   (If you look very closely, she is smiling over her tears.) Anyone who has been actually watching this trial knows that this one short moment was very fleeting, and is not a truthful account of Casey Anthony’s reactions about this tragedy.   …(sigh).  –dc

SeaWorld Tragedy

March 1, 2010

My E-mail to Bill O’Reilly, Fox News, Ref: the SeaWorld Tragedy:  Also published on Larry King Live, March 2nd, 2010 12:13 am ET

Bill,  I think the whale got the trainer’s hair (pony tail) caught in its teeth, and that is what led to the resulting tragedy.

Donald Cole
Dover, NJ

O’Reilly discussion: “God has a role in Sarah Palin’s life?”

November 18, 2009

Bill O’Reilly, God has a plan. “God’s role in Sarah Palin’s life.”

Bill, Regarding the discussion about Sarah Palin believing that God has a plan in her life: 

Here is my take on this: God is outside of time and space, and thereby already knows the future. Sarah Palin has free-will over her life, but God already knows what she is going to do, even though she doesn’t.

Consider: “And we know that all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. (Romans 8:28). — Donald Cole, Dover,  NJ.

Bill O’Reilly, Pat Robertson was correct about Islam

November 11, 2009

Bill O’Reilly, Pat Robertson was absolutely correct about the Islam ‘religion’.

This is not about people, but about the SOURCE, which is the Qur’an, –which Muslims believe was dictated word for word, from God (Allah),  to their holy prophet Muhammad, to be obeyed by all the world.

Westerners need to read the REAL Qur’an, and not the white-washed version published for the eyes of Westerners. The ‘terrorists’ have always been ‘friendly neighbors’ before showing their hand in Jihad in this country. The term “American Muslims,” is a gross contradiction of beliefs.

Forget about “Political Correctness,” and just lay out the real Qur’an for all to read. This is not about flesh and blood, but about war going on in heavenly places between good and evil.

Jesus Christ is the life, the light that overcomes the darkness.

World for Truth! Truth, not bombs; — is hope and peace everlasting. –dc

 Donald Cole, New Jersey