Posted tagged ‘John N. Clayton’

BUILDING A SECURE FAITH …by John N. Clayton

October 13, 2010

Building a Secure Faith-title

    One of the most common challenges posed to me on the e-mails we get is the question of how to build a dynamic faith that makes a difference and equips one to deal with the challenges of life. There are so many things in life that can cast doubt on a person’s belief system — hypocrisy in church leaders, claimed errors or illogical stories in the Bible, new discoveries that seem to contradict the Bible, stupid explanations by people who represent the Bible, human suffering and personal tragedy, sexual temptation, the seeming success of people who have no belief in God at all, boredom and lack of doing anything at church, bad attitudes and judgmental spirits among Christians, etc., etc., etc. It is no wonder that church attendance is at low levels and that doubt and apathy towards the Church are high in our country.
    It is ironic that with all of those things going on, there is more reason to believe and there are more tools to build a dynamic working faith than ever before on this planet. We CAN be convicted Christians whose faith can sustain us through the hard times in life. We do not have to be wavering, insecure, wishy-washy people whose lives and work are awash in doubt and inactivity. What we would like to do in this discussion is to make some practical suggestions about how to build a secure faith.

STEP 1. GET YOUR HEAD STRAIGHT ABOUT THE EVIDENCE.

 

Three heads   

Lord Kelvin, the great British thermodynamicist once said, “If you study science deeply enough and long enough it will eventually convince you there is a God.” That statement is even more true today than it was in Kelvin’s time. We now have tools that enable us to see further out into space with great visual acuity. We have microscopes that can see smaller things than could even be imagined in Kelvin’s day. We have come to understand that there is a whole new set of physical laws which govern the world of the very small — quarks, mesons, neutrinos, and dark energy. We now understand the incredible complexity of the genetic material that comprises living things, and we have been able to map our own genome and in doing so to get a picture of how complex life really is. I had a fellow science teacher who used to tell his biology classes, “Science is about trying to understand how God has done what He has done.” Our theories are frequently off base, and sometimes in the early stages of a theory it may appear that the theory is at odds with what God has told us. microscopeThe lesson of history is that when the research finally bears fruit and we come to an understanding of what really happened, we find that the facts are 100 percent in agreement with what the Bible actually says (not what a theologian may say it says).

    Real scientists understand the limitations of what they do. For us Christians there should be an insatiable thirst to learn more about the creation and to see what the handiwork of God is all about. Chemist Dr. Henry “Fritz” Schaefer III said it well, “The significance and joy in my science comes in those occasional moments of discovering something new and saying to myself, ‘So that is how God did it.’” Albert Einstein said, “A spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe — a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble.” He also wrote, “In this way the pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling of a special sort.” (See more on page 20.)
    Approaching science with religious fear and trepidation is destructive to scientific learning and to faith. We should not fear facts or evidence, and should grow in our awe and appreciation of the creation around us, This is one of the main objectives of the Does God Exist? ministry. There are also excellent materials available from other Christian apologists who do the same thing. We review their books from time to time in this journal, and it is important for people to build a library of positive Christian apologetic works. We have mentioned people like William Lane Craig, Douglas Jacoby, John Oakes, Alister McGrath, Ravi Zacharias, Hugh Ross, to name just a few.

STEP 2. AVOID THE CRACKPOTS ON BOTH SIDES

    It is a fact that if you tell somebody something often enough, he will usually believe it. Children who have been told they are worthless or unable to learn all through their childhood, will come into a classroom convinced that they cannot learn the material. This is an issue every public school classroom teacher faces on a daily basis. Young people who attend churches or have elementary school teachers who denigrate science two crackpotswill enter adulthood very jaded about any scientific claim. Young people who have grown up in an environment that denigrated the Bible and ridiculed and villainized preachers and church leaders will very likely be jaded about religion. A large percentage of atheists, especially those operating on the Web, fall into this last classification. Many creationists fall into the former one. It is important not to immerse yourself in either group’s materials. Even people like Richard Dawkins, who is a very good biologist, can have a most unfortunate and inaccurate view of God, religion, and the Bible.
    It is important to our physical health to have a balanced diet. I had a friend who had cancer and went on a diet that involved eating nothing but carrots and drinking nothing but carrot juice. Her skin actually turned the color of a carrot due to the massive amount of carotene she was ingesting. Reading nothing but wild, uninformed atheist propaganda about God and about the Bible can turn a person into a nonbeliever. Reading extremist religious material and nothing else can badly distort our ability to understand the issues and the evidence that is available. It is vital that we look at the credentials of the people we are reading. We must distinguish between people who have an ax to grind and people who are dealing with evidence, and have the background to understand the evidence they are presenting.

STEP 3. RESOLVE IN YOUR OWN MIND AND AT A REASONABLE LEVEL THE MAJOR ISSUES THAT CONCERN YOU.

    There are lots of issues that concern us all when it comes to faith in God. If we do not find a reasonable answer on these issues, they can be agents that weaken our faith and our resolve to serve God. Things like the problem of human suffering and tragedy need to be studied and resolved. That study needs to involve not only looking at the biblical answers, but also at what solutions atheists offer and how satisfying their explanations are. We have a whole Web site (whypain.org) dedicated to this question, and have written several books and have a video (available on doesgodexist.tv) dealing with this subject. Many other people have addressed the question from philosophical and theological positions. There are other issues that we need to be satisfied about, such as: how God answers prayers, how we approach morality and moral choices, how we know the Bible is the word of God, how we know we have the “right” Bible, how we are to deal with violence and human and animal rights, and how Christians handle politics and legal issues.
    This does not mean we do not grow or consider new data, nor does it mean that we cannot change our understanding of the issues. In our day and time we have seen issues like cloning, stem cell research, in vitro fertilization, organ transplants, and evolution bring new questions and challenges to us as Christians. Questions like these should never weaken or disturb our faith. We may not know everything involved in cloning, for example, but the basic principles of the Christian system allow us to consider the possibilities. No matter what we decide, it will be an application of our belief system, not a challenge to our faith. It is good to hear how mature ChriOld & young womamstians deal with issues like these. All of the subjects I have listed in this article are subjects we have dealt with in the past several years in this journal. You might not agree with my understanding or beliefs about these things, but you should at least realize that mature Christians know about the issues and have studied the issues and their implications. At the same time they have not allowed those issues to challenge their basic belief in God, the Bible, or the Christian system. As you form your own belief system about these issues, the final product should strengthen your faith.

STEP 4. GET INVOLVED IN MINISTRY.

young woman & man    Perhaps the most important step in this whole process of becoming a stable, productive Christian with a belief system that sustains you is to do something! Being a Christian does not mean going to church three times a week. Having a stable faith is not sustained just by our worship, our giving, or even our prayer life — although all of these things are important. Christianity is a way of life. It involves doing, not just hearing or reading. James talks about this exhaustively in James chapter 2 as he deals with faith and works. The point of the passage is that we do not just have faith and we do not earn our way into heaven by our works. Faith and works are symbiotic in nature. James says, “faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead” (James 2:17, NIV). Our faith without activity will die. We have to be involved.
mother & children    The involvement we are talking about is so broad that all of us are included. There is no ministry that is any more important than any other ministry. In Romans 12:3 – 8 Paul lists a sampling of ministries. It includes some of the common things like teaching and preaching, but it also lists such ministries as giving, encouraging, leading, showing mercy, and serving. Paul made the point in verse three that no one of these is any more important or more valuable than any other. One of the beautiful things about the Christian system is that we do not have to ask permission to do ministry. Our service to others,our encouraging of others, our giving to others, and even our teaching of others can be done without having to submit to a bureaucratic system of supervisors. The more Christians get involved in using whatever their talents are, the more they will grow. God promises that His Spirit will be active in supporting us so that our ministry will be productive. Active, growing churches are made up of Christians doing things where every member’s talents and abilities are used to reach out to a lost and dying world.

–John N. Clayton

Back to Contents Does God Exist?, SepOct10.

POLLUTION, PAIN, AND GOD

June 14, 2010

Article by John N. Clayton
   Posted by Donald Cole

As the father of a child born with multiple birth defects, I have struggled with the “Why me?” question as much as anyone who has been through an experience like that. The whole issue of why there is massive human pain in a world supposedly created by a kind, loving heavenly Father, is one that atheists use effectively in casting doubt on the existence of God. The usual Christian response to a discussion of why a baby should be born with massive congenital problems is to say, “This is just for a brief time in this life, and in heaven it won’t be an issue.” That is true, but not very comforting. It is also common for Christians to talk about what the baby brings to others as they serve the infant. I still vividly remember a child in my son’s class for the mentally impaired coming up to me when he heard I was giving lectures on the existence of God. As he pointed to a playground full of running, laughing children behind an elementary school he said to me, “Why did God make me retarded so I can’t do what they can do?”

There is no doubt that things like cancer, birth defects, muscular dystrophy, cerebral palsy, and cystic fibrosis bring out good things in those who care for the afflicted. I have written extensively about how my son’s multiple-birth-defect problems have changed me. (The book is entitled Timothy, My Son and My Teacher.) There is also no doubt that Christians have a better answer than atheists in this area, because atheism only suggests death since “survival of the fittest” is their guiding principle. Abortion and euthanasia are the only real options atheism offers. Atheist spokesmen, like Peter Singer, have made this clear, and on a physical level it makes sense.

Another point that has been marginally treated in apologetic literature is the long-term effect of pollution. There is a growing body of evidence that a huge percentage of the problems that come to mankind is the result of environmental irresponsibility on the part of people. We know that a large percentage of cancer is caused by man-made carcinogens in the environment. Even cancers that are not directly caused by chemicals that man has put into the air and water, are sometimes related to our own abuse of the environment. There is strong evidence that skin cancer is related to the depletion of the ozone layer, which seems to be connected to the fluorides that man has dumped into our water and air. Food additives and substitutes can have severe effects on human brains and digestive processes. The disposal of herbicides and pesticides has had catastrophic effects on countless numbers of people. Lead and mercury contamination has caused severe birth defects in all cultures of the earth. In their attempts to challenge global warming, many writers have ignored the unquestionable effects of man’s waste being put into the environment.

We are now learning that medical wastes have been disposed of in our air, rivers, lakes, and oceans, putting hormones and complex organic materials not found in nature into our food chain. In our March/April 2010 “News and Notes” we reported on how chemicals released into the air by plastic manufacturing seem to be having an effect on sexual orientation. This means that even the homosexual/heterosexual issue may be connected to what people have done with the chemicals we produce.

When God created the earth, man and his animals, God repeatedly said, “It is good.” (See Genesis 1:4, 10, 12, 18, 21, 25.) At the end of the creation process in verse 31 we are told that it was “very good.” When sin entered the picture and man began to do things that were in opposition to what God told man to do, consequences began to appear. Man’s disobedience began to generate strife leading to the first murder. It also produced negative changes in the earth’s environment. Genesis 3:17 – 20 tells us that the ground was cursed because of man and that getting food from the ground would no longer be a matter of gathering, but that labor would be required. From the beginning, man had been told that he was to take care of the world where God placed him (Genesis 2:15). Instead of doing that, mankind has used the earth as a dumping ground for our own selfish use.

It is not our intent here to suggest that science is evil, or that research into things that can improve our life should not be done. The problem is in the greed factor that has caused irresponsible actions by those producing these things commercially. God has given us the tools to do wonderful things, and He has also given us the tools to clean up after ourselves. Our failure to do this has caused massive pain for countless human beings.

The atheist is very likely to say “Why doesn’t God just stop what is happening if He is so loving and kind-hearted?” This is the same challenge as those who were victimized by the horrible things done to the Jewish population by Hitler in World War II. Why did God just not stop the horrible abuses that killed thousands of innocent people in the prison camps of Germany?

From the very beginning of God’s communication with man, God has always told us that we will reap the consequences of what we sow. In Deuteronomy 28 God makes this point clear. He begins by telling His people what would happen if they “fully obey the Lord your God and carefully follow all his commands” (verse 1). For fourteen verses God tells all the good things that will come from doing everything right. Those commands involved things like giving the land rest (Leviticus 25:5), being careful about wastes,and paying careful attention to diet. It included valid medical practices like quarantine and washing. God then tells in Deuteronomy 28:15  – 29:1 all the awful things that will happen if people live selfishly and fail to follow God’s commands. Some of the consequences are political and social, but many of them involve health and agriculture. This same principle is given in Galatians 6:1 – 10. The positive consequences from doing things God’s way are given followed by the warning, “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap” (Galatians 6:7). That promise is true individually, but it is also true for humankind as a whole.

Can we rationally believe that God should run around reversing all of the destructive things we do? Should God clean up our air as we pump chemicals into it and release man-made hormones that will upset our minds and overwhelm our social institutions? Should God remove the asbestos, lead, and mercury we dump into our lakes, rivers, and oceans so that a few individuals can make more money by not cleaning up the waste their businesses produce? We need to be angry, but not with God. God did it right, and we messed it up. The green revolution is a good thing, assuming we revert to the positive use of what God has given us and that we do not make different toxins that clean up one mess while creating another. We have the tools to do it right. We need to be indignant and angry with the situation, but let our anger go towards the selfish industrial and medical money-makers who have brought incredible pain and suffering to people all over this planet. We must not misdirect our anger toward the God who loves us, cares for us, and weeps with us at the horrible consequences of sin.

–John N. Clayton
Does God Exist?, May/Jun 2010.
http://doesgodexist.org

If there is a God, Why Are There Disasters?

March 14, 2010

THE PROBLEM OF HUMAN SUFFERING

And as Jesus passed by, he saw a man which was blind from his birth. And his disciples asked him, saying, “Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind?” Jesus answered, “Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him” (John 9:1-3).

One of the great problems and one of the great mysteries of life is the problem of human suffering and the problem of death. I suppose there is more pain and suffering today than there ever has been on the face of the earth-if for no other reason than the fact that there are more people than ever before. Not only is there more physical pain, but there is also more emotional and mental pain than there has ever been. Almost every time that I am involved in a lectureship on a college campus or a similar place I have people–young people usually–who will come to me and say, “Well all right, you’ve shown us that there is some evidence for God’s existence, but if there is a God and if he is a loving and merciful God, how do you explain the problems of suffering and death and all the tragedies that happen to people?” Why is it that these things occur? I believe any question that man can ask has a reasonable answer-at least an answer that is as consistent with God’s existence as it is in opposition to God’s existence. And so, in the problem of human suffering and the problem of death and tragedies-things that happen to all of us–there are answers. It is not going to be possible in this booklet to give an answer to every conceivable situation that one might conjecture could occur or has occurred. But there are some things that can be said and some points that can be made that are useful and helpful in better understanding the problem of human suffering and in demonstrating that these things are not inconsistent with a loving and merciful God, such as the God we read of in the Bible.

There are some things that are obvious enough and that are simple enough to understand, that there is no need to go into great detail. So, I just want to mention them very briefly.

For instance, there are those who say there is no such thing as pain. There is a school of thought that says that pain does not really exist, that it is all in your mind, that if you experience pain, it is because you are weak or because you are psychologically not properly oriented or because you are not spiritual enough or whatever it might be–that pain is an illusion. But I doubt very sincerely if too many of us take this point of view seriously. Medically we know that the brain makes responses to a pin prick in the finger. There are very few of us that when we stick ourselves with a pin or cut ourselves do not thoroughly and completely believe that pain is real, and so I do not intend to go into this in great detail.

Although there are many things that could be said, I do not think it is necessary for us to get involved in long and protracted discussions about the things that we experience as far as pain and suffering go as a result of our own deliberate sin. In short, if you jump off a bridge you should not get too upset with God when you hit the bottom. We have examples of this in the Bible: Saul, David, Cain, Adam and Eve–individuals who suffered because of their transgressions of what God has said to do and what not to do. Certainly, in today’s world we see this. The people who drink alcoholic beverages can expect to have problems getting their brains to function properly in old age. They are people who can expect to have problems with liver cirrhosis and things of this kind. They can expect to have difficulties that are a result of having taken this material, this poisonous intoxicant material, into their bodies. People who smoke can expect to have problems with their lungs (emphysema, lung cancer, things of this type). The person who commits adultery can expect the consequences of that–the psychological damage, and disappointment. The person who drives too fast, uses drugs, or lies–is involved in things that naturally precipitate problems for us and they fall in the category of jumping off the bridge. I believe that if we abuse ourselves, we cannot be angry with our Creator for not stepping in and helping us avoid the consequences of these things. It would be unreasonable to expect God to stop us from hitting the bottom when we jump off a bridge. And so if we persist in taking chemicals into our body, in doing things that are contradictory to what God has told us to do, we can expect to suffer. I do not believe that it is inconsistent with the nature of God for a man to expect to suffer when he tampers with nature or when he fails to heed the situations that occur when our natural situation is abused.

When man was put upon the earth he was told to be fruitful, to replenish the earth, to subdue it. His first responsibility upon the earth (his only responsibility when he was first here) was to “care for the garden,” to take care of the earth, to make sure that the earth was properly nurtured and properly supervised. The essence of that command still exists. Man still has the responsibility to take care of this beautiful creation that God has given us. Much of the suffering and tragedy man experiences is because he has not discharged this responsibility.

Man’s persistence in polluting the water, for example, has caused disease and other problems which in some cases have been tragic. Man’s unwise use of the land has caused floods and tornadoes that have brought great tragedy and great suffering upon man. When we violate the natural environment that God has given us, we cannot expect God to allow the consequences of this violation to occur. We know that emphysema and some of the other diseases that we have come in contact with have been, at least in some cases, caused by our violation of the air that God has given us originally in a state that did not cause these things. We have evidence that even leukemia may be related to man’s indiscriminate use of nuclear energy.

Another aspect of the problem of suffering is seen when we fail to heed the warnings of nature and thus reap the consequences. I think there are many classic illustrations of this. In California, for example, there is an area near Los Angeles where the earth is under great stress, and where there are a tremendous number of cracks, or faults as they are called. Geologists have warned the builders in that area that this is a place where they need to be extremely careful not to build tall buildings and that they should not construct structures that are sensitive to earthquakes and to cracks and shifting of the earth. Yet at this time there is a building under construction to replace a hospital that was knocked down by an earthquake not too long ago. This building is suppose to be sixteen stories tall and has no earthquake provisions of any real consequence in it. It is being partially financed by the Federal Government, and is straddling the very fault that knocked down the hospital that it is replacing. Now I’d like you to think for a minute, who will get the blame when an earthquake rolls through that area, knocking down the brand new hospital and perhaps killing ten million people, including everybody in the hospital? Who is going to get the blame? Well, I will guarantee you that there will be those people who will say, “If there was a God that wouldn’t have happened”. And yet the warning is there. If you build your house in the mouth of a volcano, it does not seem to me that you have too much to complain about when it erupts. A surprising amount of the problems we have fall into these categories that we have briefly examined.

But on the other hand I opened this discussion by reading to you a passage from the 9th chapter of John, which describes a situation that does not fall in this category. Jesus was passing by, the Bible tells us in John 9:1-3, and he saw a man who was blind from his birth, born without sight. Now his disciples asked him the typical question. They said, “Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind?” It was their conviction that the problems that the man had were a result of man’s sin, which in some cases is correct. But notice what Jesus said in the third verse: “Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.” Jesus said it was not because this man sinned or not even because his parents sinned that he was born blind. It was not sin that did it. It was not that this man abused his body; it was not that this man abused his environment; it was not that this man failed to heed the warnings of his environment. Jesus said it was that the works of God should be made manifest in him. Before we conclude I want to explain to you what I think that means.

First let us take a look at a few points that are related to this type of problem, at least in an indirect way. Let us see if we can make some sense of some of the things that you and I experience: some of the things that come our way in life that we sometimes find somewhat difficult to explain or somewhat difficult to rationalize or to work out in our own minds. There are some, for example, who suggest to us that pain is something that should not occur if there is a God. And yet, physical pain and other types of pain are absolutely necessary if we are to survive in a physical way. There was a story in Reader’s Digest about a little boy in India who was born without the nerve endings of the extremities of his body connected to his brain. In simple terms, this child could not experience physical pain. Now you know, we might think that would be marvelous to never have a stubbed toe, a headache, a backache, or all the other aches and pains that bother all of us. But this is a very tragic, unpleasant story. This little boy was about 10 or 11 months old, just beginning to walk around hanging onto things, when his mother was kneading bread over on the counter and smelled the odor of burning human flesh. She turned and saw her little boy with his hands on the hot furnace in the center of the room, and the doctors were just barely able to save his hands by skin grafting. You see, that child could not know that the furnace was hot, and the natural reflex built into each of us was not operative in this child. Consequently he was not protected by experiencing normal pain. Any normal child would probably have never touched the thing, and if they had they would have jerked away immediately. They would have experienced pain. They would have screamed and would have gotten help immediately without a serious bum. But this child did not have that protection. A few months later the child came in one day and collapsed in the doorway of the hut, and when the mother picked him up she noticed his foot was badly cut and he had an obvious loss of blood. Once again his life was saved by transfusions but you see his body could not say to his brain, “You’ve been hurt! Get help! You need attention quickly.” We need physical pain. The tragic end of the story came when the child was barely eight years old. He came in one day and laid down on the mat in the corner of the hut as is the custom in that country. The mother went over to check on him a few minutes later and found he was dead. An autopsy revealed he had died of a ruptured appendix. You see his body could not say to his brain, “You’re sick. You need help. You’re in trouble.” Consequently, survival was not possible.

The writer says in Psalm 139:14, “I will praise thee for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvelous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.” Indeed this physical body that I live in, ugly as it may be on the outside, is a marvelous machine–and if properly cared for might run as long as a hundred years without a valve job or a new transmission or even a change in oil. (Some of us may sometimes feel like we need a new transmission, but the fact of the matter is that we are fearfully and wonderfully made.) Physical pain is a part of being fearfully and wonderfully made; physical pain is that which protects us and enables us to survive in the environment in which we live.

I would like to suggest to you further that this same type of thing is true in the emotional sense. What kind of man would it be who could not experience guilt and sympathy and compassion and who could not relate to the needs of fellow human beings? We have had some famous people who were like this. They wear names like Hitler, Mussolini and Eichman–men who could watch innocent women and children by the tens of thousands walk to their death in the gas chamber and apparently not be moved. These men apparently were not able to feel sympathy or compassion or guilt in any way.

If you are a young man dating a young woman who cannot be moved by the saddest of human experiences (if she can watch the saddest movie and a tear does not come to her eye; if she can hear of the greatest plight of human beings and if she can observe the suffering and pain of others and not be moved) you had better think very seriously about what kind of a wife this girl is going to be. Is she going to be able to relate to your needs? Is she going to relate to your feelings? Is she going to have compassion for what you need in life? And when you fail, is she going to be sympathetic and understanding? Is she going to be a “helpmeet”, or is she going to be “millstone” dragging you down, one who has no capacity to relate to you and to help you when you need help?

Perhaps even a greater need is the reverse direction. If you are a young lady dating a young man and if this young man somehow has the distorted, perverted idea that masculine strength depends on not being sensitive and not being able to relate to the needs of other human beings, you had better think very seriously about what kind of husband this man is going to be. If he can watch the saddest movie and not be moved and if he can watch the greatest tragedy of human life and not be disturbed, you can be sure he is going to be a husband who is totally unable to relate to you in the difficult business of being a woman and the more difficult business of being a mother. Do you really believe he is going to feel for your needs and be sympathetic to your problems? Is he really going to be helpful to you when you need help?

I am convinced that one of the greatest tragedies of our society today is the fact that somehow we have equated the ability to be sympathetic, the ability to be compassionate, the ability to relate to the needs of our fellow human beings as weakness–when, in fact, it is a sign of strength.

Sometime ago, the little girl who lived next door to us went to the shopping center to get some cokes for some friends of hers. She was brutally attacked by a man in the parking lot of that shopping enter. Before the evening was finished she had been stabbed 24 times, and she died. Why did no one meet her needs? How could a young lady possibly be stabbed mercilessly for thirty minutes in a New York street with 1100 young men in the near vicinity and have nobody move to help her? Why is it that we have somehow equated the ability of a man to be sympathetic, to be compassionate, to be helpful, to be understanding, to relate to the needs of his fellow human beings as a sign of weakness? I would suggest to you that any third grade weakling can turn his back on the needs of those who are suffering and who need help. Anybody can refuse to help and refuse to relate to the needs of others. A man of strength is a man who can stand above a cold impersonal city and with tears in his eyes say, “Oh Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together even as a hen gathereth her chicks under her wings, and ye would not!” There is a man of strength; there is a man who was not afraid to get involved; there is a man who paid with his life for his ability to relate to the needs of other people; and there was the Son of God–Jesus Christ! We need to get over this idea that somehow the man who can do this–the man who can be sympathetic and compassionate, who can move into people’s lives and try to help them–is a weak man. In fact, just the opposite is true.

I am also convinced that one of our great problems in this area of pain and suffering and death is brought on by ignorance. And I suppose that this is true of death more than anything else. Ignorance has caused us to throw away one of the great blessings that we have in being a Christian. My little girl taught me a great lesson in this area when she was five years old. We had a little puppy that had grown up with our children. One day the little puppy was attacked viciously in our garage by three very large dogs and was badly injured. When I came home from work I found my children gathered around a blood-soaked blanket with the dog inside it. I took the dog to the veterinarian knowing full well that there was very little hope for her survival, and in fact, there was none. As I went back home, I kept wondering what I was going to say to my children. How was I going to explain to them that this little puppy that they had grown up with and that they loved, was no longer alive? I came into the living room and sat down, and with tears coming from my own eyes I said to my children, “I have some bad news for you, children. Susie is no longer alive. She’s dead.” Cathy, the little five year old looked up at me and said, “Well, Daddy, I’m so glad.” And she smiled. I said, “Cathy, honey, you don’t understand. You’re never going to see Susie again. Susie is dead.” Cathy looked at me and said, “Well, Daddy, I didn’t want to see Susie go on suffering like that.” You talk about feeling an inch high! I realized that my five year old had a better hold on some aspects of death than I did.

In fact, is it not a marvelous thing that when those we love are no longer able to exist realistically in a physical way that they do not have to go on suffering. God has provided a means by which the spirit can be separated from the body and the physical pain that we endure now fades into insignificance. It is interesting to me that the apostles rarely used the term death to describe the end of life. They talked about being “asleep in Jesus,” about being “absent from the body,” about being “at home with God,” and so forth. I have known people who when they lost a husband or a wife, a mother or a father, a child, a brother or a sister, have somehow seemed to quit living themselves. They atrophy and are no longer able to be happy, useful, and productive. This is a great tragedy. I pointed out in one of my other lectures that as a Christian we ought to be able to look at life much more positively because of death. As an atheist, as a disbeliever, as one alienated from God, a person has to look at life with all of its problems, with all of its suffering, with all of the pain, with all of the terrible things that one has to endure as the absolute best that he is ever going to experience. And yet, if we are wearing Christ, if we are a part of Jesus, we can look at life with all of its joy, with all of its beauty, with all of the wonderful things that we all enjoy as the absolute worst that we are ever going to have to endure. Can’t we see that the difference is as different as left and right, as black and white, as night and day? If there was no other reason for us to believe in God but this one, it would be a compelling reason. Ignorance is one of the great curses of man. Ignorance of death is one of the great curses of the Christian.

I am sure all of you have heard lessons from one time or another of the value of pain and suffering in people’s lives. I think that it would be important for us here to make just a comment along these lines, even though it is a point you have undoubtedly heard. I think perhaps the best illustration that I have heard is a very old story but one that illustrates the point very well. There were five brothers out west somewhere who at one time had attended the services of the Church, but had become indifferent because of lack of involvement. They were not in attendance, not faithful, and were completely inactive. The story goes that at one time the oldest brother, John, was out behind the barn and he got bit on the arm by a rattlesnake. Of course the other brothers were greatly concerned. They called the elders and the preacher and anybody else they could get to pray for John. They made all kinds of promises of the things they were going to do. It was not too long until John began to recover. As he recovered, he reflected upon his condition and his rejection of God and his lack of involvement and the fact that he had not been faithful to the Lord. So he turned away from the kind of life he had been living, and he came to God. He got involved in the work program of the Church, and became a very active, very dedicated Christian. The story goes that one Sunday the preacher, in the process of a prayer, said, “Lord send us four more rattlesnakes that we may reach John’s four brothers.”

I am sure that no preacher would want to bring that kind of pain and suffering into a man’s life, but the fact of the matter is that sometimes it takes pain, sometimes it takes suffering, sometimes it takes a tragedy to make us realize that we need God. Pain humbles us. Somebody has said, “Humility is a funny thing. Just when you think you have it, you’ve lost it.” Certainly that is true in 2 Corinthians 12:7 Paul said, “…lest I should be exalted above measure…. there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I be exalted above measure.” The apostle Paul apparently had a problem. The pain and suffering (the thorn in the flesh, whatever it was) helped Paul. It helped him overcome any sense of egotism that might have been part of his life. Sometimes it takes a tragedy to make us realize we are not self-sufficient. Sometimes it takes a disease to make us realize that no matter how much money we have, no matter how vocal we are, no matter how many friends we have, no matter what our situation in life might be, that sometimes there is no one who can help us but God. “…Whether we live therefore, or die, we are the Lord’s” (Romans 14:8).

The last point that I wish to make in our discussion is probably the most important point–a point that I think each of us needs to think about very, very seriously and understand very completely–especially as far as the Christian’s situation connected with pain and suffering is concerned. The point deals most precisely with the passage of Scripture from John 9:1-3 that we read earlier in our discussion. Every now and then, I will discuss this subject with someone who will say, “Well, if God were real and if everything was as you say it is, then certainly Christians following God’s system would not have to experience pain and suffering.” I think if we consider that point of view for a few minutes we see that obviously this is not a realistic position for a number of reasons.

First of all, if becoming a Christian would automatically unravel all the various problems that confront a person in life, then we would have people flocking to religion to get away from their problems. The way it is, there are some people using religion as an escape mechanism when that is not what God intended. God wants us to serve him because we love him, not out of fear. It would be unreal and unrealistic for us to really believe that somehow being a Christian ought to exempt us from the problems that other people have to endure.

But I think even far more fundamental and far more important than this is the fact that if Christians did not suffer, they would be totally and completely incapable of doing what they were put here to do. God intends for his followers to communicate with the world, to bring Jesus Christ into the lives of people. You cannot communicate with a man unless you are enduring or have endured some of the same things that he has endured. As a matter of fact, I believe that the bad experiences that you and I have to put up with and that we all undergo from time to time are actually talents. They are actually things that enable us to communicate with our fellow man and meet his needs. I hope you will pardon this very personal reference but I do not really know any other way to present what I am trying to say here than to show you in my own life what God has done and how things have worked to his glory.

Some years ago my wife and I decided that as a part of service to the Lord we would adopt some children. We wanted to raise these children in a Christian home. We wanted to love them as any parent loves their children, and help them find the happiness and joy that we have found in Christ in our marriage together. We made the proper arrangements, and in a very short period of time, we were allowed to bring home a little boy as our own son. We were very, very happy. We named him Timothy, because I had great dreams for this young man. It was my sincere hope and prayer that this child might develop to be a great gospel preacher like the Timothy I read about in the Bible–that he might be able to do what I knew his daddy would never be able to do because of his background, his lack of training, and his ability. We had this child for about six months when we began to recognize that something was not developing normally in the child. One day we took the child to a doctor. When the doctor examined the baby he said, “Mr. and Mrs. Clayton, I hate to tell you this, but your child is blind. He can’t see. He’s got congenital cataracts and not only that, it also appears that there will probably be other difficulties. This child is apparently a rubella child. His mother apparently had German measles (rubella) during the pregnancy and he may have a heart defect. He will probably be retarded. There are a variety of things that could be wrong. As a medical doctor, I must advise you to put this child away in an institution, get another baby, and forget about him.” We had had this child for about six months. He was as much our child as any child is anybody’s child. You can imagine the kind of impact that this had on a man who had been a Christian a very short time. That night we went out for a drive. While my wife went in to get something at a shopping center, I can remember sitting in the car holding this little baby in my arms, looking into that little face I had grown to love, and saying to God over and over, “Why Lord, why? Why would you do this to me? After I’ve come out of atheism: After I’ve sacrificed everything I know to sacrifice. After I’ve done everything I know to do, why would you do this to me?”

The answer did not come right away. We went through an agonizing period of time. Many people tried to tell us that we ought to institutionalize the child, and sometimes this is necessary. There are times when the best thing for the child, the best thing for the parents, and the best thing for all concerned is to institutionalize a child that has problems that cannot be met satisfactorily in a home situation. But we did not know what this child’s situation was. I kept reading passages like John 9, “Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.” I read passages that said that “…all things work together for good to them that love God…” (Romans 8:28). There had to be a reason for this! There had to be some kind of understanding that I could get that would make me realize why this thing had happened! We determined that at least until we knew what the child’s situation was, we had to stick this thing out. People who did not share our convictions tried to influence us to wash our hands of the situation. We went through five surgeries on the baby’s eyes. After three surgeries one eye was lost. The other eye has 20/200 vision in a tunnel, which is very poor vision and is considered legally blind. We found that the child was retarded but that the retardation was not as bad as it might have been. We are still working to the end that Tim has the potential of achieving some useful place in society. I suppose that even during these few years when we were going through all of this, I began to recognize some value in what had happened. Certainly, my wife and I were closer as man and wife because we had endured this thing together. We had to support each other and help each other through the problem. By having had this somewhat abnormal situation I am sure that we appreciate our so-called normal children (if any child is normal) a whole lot more. But the real significance of this passage in John 9 which we have been talking about, and the real significance of what had happened, did not occur to me until a friend in Pontiac, Michigan, wrote me and said, “John, there is a young man and his wife here that have a baby with essentially the same difficulties that your Timmy has and I don’t know what to say to them. They are distraught and talking about leaving the Lord. I wondered if you would write them a letter explaining to them what has happened to you, and if you would perhaps help them in some way.” I must confess that his letter made me angry. I did not want to do it. I stuck the letter in the desk and had no intention of writing anything to anybody about a situation like this. But I guess my conscience bothered me, and I did not want him writing me another letter. Finally one night I sat down with the intent of writing a sentence or two to these people to get my responsibility over with. I wrote a sentence or two, and then I wrote another paragraph, and then another page, and another page. I do not really remember how many pages I wrote, but I wrote them an extremely long letter–almost a small book. You see, I could say to these people, “Now look, I know what you are going through because I’ve been over that road.” Most of you have not had that experience. I hope you never do. It is a terrible thing to look at a child that you have planned great things for, that you love very much, and realize that nothing that you had dreamed about can really come true. It is a terrible thing, but it is something that I have been through and I could say to this young man and this young woman, “I know how you feel. You can have great joy and a great blessing in this thing.”

Because of this experience, I began to realize that I had a talent. I had an ability. I had an opportunity to relate to people to whom no one else in my immediate area could relate. A couple months later when I was in New York I met an elder in the Church who had a Mongoloid child. I could relate to him. I could help him realize that there were others who shared his burden and his problem. Sometime later in my own congregation a family that we loved very much had a child born with the same problem. Once again we could help, advise, and relate to their needs. We could help them get programs that were useful to them and to their child. You see I have a talent and an ability that nobody else has in my immediate area–to relate to people and to bring Christ into the lives of people who are experiencing this kind of difficulty.

But I cannot go to a man who has lost his father and say I know how you feel, because at this time I do not. I cannot go to a man who has lost his mother, his child, his brother or his sister and meet his needs because I have not had those experiences. I cannot go to a teen-ager who has divorced parents and say I know how you feel, because I do not. I do not have the slightest idea how they feel. But some of you do. Some of you have had these experiences, and you have weathered the storm. You can go to people and relate to their needs. You can help them through their difficulties. You have a talent. What are you doing with that talent?

One time a young lady, a Red Cross nurse, was in Pennsylvania when a terrible train wreck occurred. People were injured, bleeding, and dying everywhere. She came before other medical help arrived, and began to meet the needs of these people the best she could. One of the first people she saw was a man in a business suit walking around in a state of shock saying over and over again, “My instruments, my instruments! If only I had my instruments!” She administered to his needs, and got him out of his state of shock. As she turned to leave him she said to him, “Sir, I just wondered if you could tell me something. As you saw all these terrible injuries you kept wailing around saying, ‘My instruments, my instruments, if only I had my instruments!’ What was going through your mind?” The man stood up and said to her, “Young lady, I better introduce myself.” He told her his name. He said that he was a head surgeon in a hospital near there, and all he could think of as he looked around and saw all these terrible injuries was that if only he had his surgical tools (his instruments), he could help meet these people’s needs and bring relief to their pain and suffering.

My friend, I wonder how many times God in heaven looks down at the problems this earth has, looks at you and looks at me and says, “My instruments, my instruments, if only I had my instruments!!! ”

Are you an instrument of God? You need to answer that for yourself right now. Are you an instrument of God? Are you a tool of the Lord bringing joy, peace, and relief into the lives of people? Or are you a part of the problem bringing pain and despair because of your lack of involvement? You cannot be an instrument of God unless you are forged according to God’s plan. The blacksmith cannot make an ax unless he uses a plan or a pattern. God said you must believe in him. Don’t you believe? Are you willing to admit this belief, which we call confession? Are you willing to live God’s system and repent and turn away from the world’s way of life? Are you willing to be forged in God’s system by being buried in water in baptism for the remission of your sins to become an instrument of God? Then, as an instrument of God, use your talents and your abilities to bring joy, relief, peace, love, and understanding into a world so desperately in need of these things? There are some of you who undoubtedly have been instruments of God at one time. But you are just like the ax that the blacksmith made. When he finished making it, it was beautiful, shiny, and new. Then somebody left it in the garden and it has been unused and been exposed to the elements and the forces of this world. Just like that ax, you have become rusty, corroded, something that nobody wants to have anything to do with, despicable because you are no longer a beautiful, shiny, clean useful instrument of God. Will you be an instrument of God? Will you be a part of the Lord’s work? If you will be an instrument of God and if you will follow God’s system you have the greatest promise that can be made to a person considering human suffering and pain and death. “And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away” (Revelation 21:4). Be an instrument of God!

P.S.. Since the original writing of this booklet my wife and I have continued to wrestle with the problem of a visually handicapped mentally retarded child. In an attempt to reach out to people with the same kinds of difficulties we have written another book titled Timothy–My Son and Teacher which we would be happy to loan to anyone, or provide to anyone at our cost, who has wrestled, is wrestling, or knows someone who is wrestling with the problem of a damaged child. If you are interested in this book or anything else in the Does God Exist? materials please write us.

Sincerely,

John & Phyllis Clayton


Please visit our Web site Does God Exist?

(This Article submitted by Don Cole, Dover NJ)

A Practical Man’s Proof of God

October 6, 2009

A PRACTICAL MAN’S

 PROOF OF GOD

…by John N. Clayton,  www.doesgodexist.org 

The existence of God is a subject that has occupied schools of philosophy and theology for thousands of years.  Most of the time, these debates have revolved around all kinds of assumptions and definitions.  Philosophers will spend a lifetime arguing about the meaning of a word and never really get there.  One is reminded of the college student who was asked how his philosophy class was going.  He replied that they had not done much because when the teacher tried to call roll, the kids kept arguing about whether they existed or not.

    Most of us who live and work in the real world do not concern ourselves with such activities.  We realize that such discussions may have value and interest in the academic world, but the stress and pressure of day-to-day life forces us to deal with a very pragmatic way of making decisions.  If I ask you to prove to me that you have $2.00, you would show it to me.  Even in more abstract things we use common sense and practical reasoning.  If I ask you whether a certain person is honest or not, you do not flood the air with dissertations on the relative nature of honesty; you would give me evidence one way or the other.  The techniques of much of the philosophical arguments that go on would eliminate most of engineering and technology if they were applied in those fields.

    The purpose of this brief study is to offer a logical, practical, pragmatic proof of the existence of God from a purely scientific perspective.  To do this, we are assuming that we exist, that there is reality, and that the matter of which we are made is real.  If you do not believe that you exist, you have bigger problems than this study will entail and you will have to look elsewhere.

THE BEGINNING

    If we do exist, there are only two possible explanations as to how our existence came to be.  Either we had a beginning or we did not have a beginning.  The Bible says, “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth” (Genesis 1 :1).  Most atheists maintain that there was no beginning.  The idea is that matter has always existed in the form of either matter or energy; and all that has happened is that matter has been changed from form to form, but it has always been.  The Humanist Manifesto says, “Matter is self-existing and not created,” and that is a concise statement of the atheist’s belief.

    The way we decide whether the atheist is correct or not is to see what science has discovered about this question.  The picture below on the left represents our part of the cosmos.  Each of the disk shaped objects is a galaxy like our Milky Way.  All of these galaxies are moving relative to each other.  Their movement has a very distinct pattern which causes the distance between the galaxies to get greater with every passing day.  If we had three galaxies located at positions A, B. and C in the second diagram below, and if they are located as shown, tomorrow they will be further apart.  The triangle they form will be bigger.  The day after tomorrow the triangle will be bigger yet.  We live in an expanding universe that gets bigger and bigger and bigger with every passing day.

 Now let us suppose that we made time run backwards!   If we are located at a certain distance today, then yesterday we were closer together.  The day before that, we were still closer.  Ultimately, where must all the galaxies have been?  At a point!  At the beginning!  At what scientists call a singularity!  In 1999, it was discovered that the galaxies are accelerating in their expansion.  Any notion that we live in an oscillating or pulsating universe has been dispelled by this discovery.  The universe is not slowing down, but speeding up in its motion.

A second proof is seen in the energy sources that fuel the cosmos.  The picture to the right is a picture of the sun.  Like all stars, the sun generates its energy by a nuclear process known as thermonuclear fusion.  Every second that passes, the sun compresses 564 million tons of hydrogen into 560 million tons of helium with 4 million tons of matter released as energy.  In spite of that tremendous consumption of fuel, the sun has only used up 2% of the hydrogen it had the day it came into existence.  This incredible furnace is not a process confined to the sun.  Every star in the sky generates its energy in the same way.  Throughout the cosmos there are 25 quintillion stars, each converting hydrogen into helium, thereby reducing the total amount of hydrogen in the cosmos.  Just think about it!  If everywhere in the cosmos hydrogen is being consumed and if the process has been going on forever, how much hydrogen should be left?

Suppose I attempt to drive my automobile without putting any more gas (fuel) into it.  As I drive and drive, what is eventually going to happen?  I am going to run out of gas!  If the cosmos has been here forever, we would have run out of hydrogen long ago!  The fact is, however, that the sun still has 98% of its original hydrogen.  The fact is that hydrogen is the most abundant material in the universe!  Everywhere we look in space we can see the hydrogen 21-cm line in the spectrum–a piece of light only given off by hydrogen.  This could not be unless we had a beginning!

A third scientific proof that the atheist is wrong is seen in the second law of thermodynamics.  In any closed system, things tend to become disordered.  If an automobile is driven for years and years without repair, for example, it will become so disordered that it would not run any more.  Getting old is simple conformity to the second law of thermodynamics.  In space, things also get old.  Astronomers refer to the aging process as heat death.  If the cosmos is “everything that ever was or is or ever will be,” as Dr. Carl Sagan was so fond of saying, nothing could be added to it to improve its order or repair it.  Even a universe that expands and collapses and expands again forever would die because it would lose light and heat each time it expanded and rebounded.

The atheist’s assertion that matter/energy is eternal is scientifically wrong.  The biblical assertion that there was a beginning is scientifically correct.

THE CAUSE
 
If we know the creation has a beginning, we are faced with another logical question–was the creation caused or was it not caused?  The Bible states, “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.”  Not only does the Bible maintain that there was a cause (a creation) but it also tells us what the cause was.  It was God. The atheist tells us that “matter is self-existing and not created.”  If matter had a beginning and yet was uncaused, one must logically maintain that something would have had to come into existence out of nothing.  From empty space with no force, no matter, no energy, and no intelligence, matter would have to become existent.  Even if this could happen by some strange new process unknown to science today, there is a logical problem.

In order for matter to come out of nothing, all of our scientific laws dealing with the conservation of matter/energy would have to be wrong, invalidating all of chemistry.  All of our laws of conservation of angular momentum would have to be wrong, invalidating all of physics.  All of our laws of conservation of electric charge would have to be wrong, invalidating all of electronics and demanding that your TV set not work!  Your television set may not work, but that is not the reason!  In order to believe matter is uncaused, one has to discard known laws and principles of science.  No reasonable person is going to do this simply to maintain a personal atheistic position.

The atheist’s assertion that matter is eternal is wrong.  The atheist’s assertion that the universe is uncaused and selfexisting is also incorrect.  The Bible’s assertion that there was a beginning which was caused is supported strongly by the available scientific evidence.

THE DESIGN

If we know that the creation had a beginning and we know that the beginning was caused, there is one last question for us to answer–what was the cause?  The Bible tells us that God was the cause.  We are further told that the God who did the causing did so with planning and reason and logic.  Romans 1:20 tells us that we can know God is “through the things he has made.”  The atheist, on the other hand, will try to convince us that we are the product of chance.  Julian Huxley once said:

We are as much a product of blind forces as is the falling of a stone to earth or the ebb and flow of the tides.  We have just happened, and man was made flesh by a long series of singularly beneficial accidents.

The subject of design has been one that has been explored in many different ways.  For most of us, simply looking at our newborn child is enough to rule out chance.  Modern-day scientists like Paul Davies and Frederick Hoyle and others are raising elaborate objections to the use of chance in explaining natural phenomena.  A principle of modern science has emerged in the 1980s called “the anthropic principle.”  The basic thrust of the anthropic principle is that chance is simply not a valid mechanism to explain the atom or life.  If chance is not valid, we are constrained to reject Huxley’s claim and to realize that we are the product of an intelligent God.

THE NEXT STEP

We have seen a practical proof of God’s existence in this brief study.  A flood of questions arise at this point.  Which God are we talking about?  Where did God come from?  Why did God create us?  How did God create us?

All of these questions and many more are answered in the same way–by looking at the evidence in a practical, common sense way.  If you are interested in pursuing these things in more detail, we invite you to contact us.  We have available books, audio tapes/CDs, video tapes/DVDs, correspondence courses, and booklets/pamphlets and all can be obtained on loan without cost.  You can get more information on what is available from our catalog online or by requesting our catalog from the address below.  Click this link for a PDF copy of this article (it will print on 8-1/2 x 14 inch paper).  You can request a printed copy of this pamphlet from:

DOES GOD EXIST?
PO Box 2704
South Bend IN 46680-2704

REFERENCES:
Glanz, James, “Accelerating the Cosmos,” Astronomy, October, 1999.
Hoyle, Frederick, The Intelligent Universe, Hol t, Rinehart & Winston, 1983.
Humanist Manifest I and II, Prometheus Books, 700 East Amherst St., Buffalo, NY 14215, 1985.

08/27/2007

Answering Challenges to the Bible

August 25, 2009

Answering Challenges to the Bible

One of the interesting challenges to Christians during the twenty-first century has been the challenge to the credibility of the Bible. It is interesting that this challenge has nothing to do with the existence of God. There are atheists who seem to think that if somehow they can find a mistake in the Bible, or a logical inconsistency in what the Bible teaches, they have proven that God does not exist. The basic arguments for the existence of God do not involve the Bible. The big question is whether there is any God, anything out there beyond the physical world that we can perceive through our five senses. If you have examined the material presented by this ministry, you have seen that our material supporting the existence of God does not depend on the Bible. Cosmological, teleological, ontological, moral, and philosophical proofs of God’s existence can be made with no appeal to scripture.

By the same token, those of us who have studied the Bible in depth and with an attempt to be honest with the evidence have seen that there is good support for the Bible not being the work of ignorant men living in an ignorant age. Once you admit to the existence of a God—some higher power, then the next logical set of questions involve which God, what is that God’s nature? how does that God operate? why did that God create us? and what would that God have us do to fulfill the purpose for which we were created? If we are not confident that the Bible is from God, then we certainly will not allow it to control the way we make decisions, and this doubt is at the root of much of the immorality that permeates our society today. We have dealt with this issue previously in this journal (see July/August 2003, page 9; January/February 2006, page 30; November/December 2006, page 8).

Those who claim the Bible is full of errors, inconsistencies, and contradictions make six fundamental errors in their challenges to the credibility of the Bible. We would like to take a look at each of these errors and see an example or two of each. Atheists’ Web sites and books are full of examples of things they consider to be errors, but almost all of them fall into one of these six areas. Before we engage in this discussion I want to be sure to clarify that I do not have every question about the Bible answered, nor am I arrogant enough to believe that I can answer every question that others can ask. By the same token, the level of ignorance displayed in the attacks being made on the Bible is very high, and can be answered by anyone who will take the time to study the claimed errors carefully.

COPYIST ERRORS DO EXIST. For most of the time the Bible has been in existence, manuscripts were copied by hand. Many times the words being copied are very close in appearance, and it is easy to make a mistake in a handwritten manuscript. The number 4, for example, is rbh in Hebrew while the number 40 is rbym. In the King James translation of 1 Kings 4:26, we are told that Solomon had 12,000 horses. Second Chronicles 9:25 confirms that number, but differs from 1 Kings in how many stalls he had. Second Chronicles says there were 4,000 stalls and 1 Kings says there were 40,000 stalls. Any honest reader is going to realize that 40,000 stalls for 12,000 horses does not make much sense. Somewhere in copying there was an error made as the words rbym and rbh were confused. In spite of these errors, as new copies of manuscripts from the first several centuries are found, the consistency and accuracy of the copies of the Bible is remarkable.

READING SURROUNDING VERSES ELIMINATES MANY CLAIMED ERRORS. Sometimes what appears to be a contradiction is resolved if one just reads a little further in the verses that describe the event that appears to be in error. A good example of this is seen in the various quotes of what was written on the sign nailed to Jesus’ cross.

Matthew 27:37 “This is Jesus the King of the Jews”
Mark 15:26 “The King of the Jews”
Luke 23:38 “This is the King of the Jews”
John 19:19
“Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews”
   

These descriptions have been held up as proof that the Bible has errors because a sign cannot have four very different messages written on it. The fact is however, that if one keeps reading John 19 in verse 20 we are told that there were three messages–written in Greek, Latin, and Aramaic, which explains the difference in wording.

Another example of this is seen in the charge by skeptics that Jesus erred in Mark 2:26 when He indicated that Abiathar was High Priest when David ate the consecrated bread. The charge is based on the fact that 1 Samuel 21:1-6 tells us that the high priest was Abimelech. Jesus actually says that the event was in the days of Abiathar and if you keep reading 1 Samuel you will see that in 1 Samuel 22:17-19 Saul had Abimelech killed and Abiathar took over.

A CLAIMED ERROR MAY BE ONE OF A SEQUENCE OF EVENTS THAT CAN BE ELIMINATED WHEN THE SEQUENCE IS EXAMINED. One of the favorite claims by atheists of biblical errors involves the visit of “Mary” to the tomb. In Mark 16:2 we are told that Mary came to the tomb very early when the sun had risen, but in John 20:1 we are told that Mary came to the tomb before sunrise while it was dark. In Matthew 28:1 we are told that Mary Magdalene and “the other Mary” came to look at the tomb. In Luke 24:1 we are told that several women came. As you read these accounts you find the women doing different things and having different experiences. In Mark the women tell no one, while in Matthew they tell the disciples.

To create a conflict, atheists assume that all of these accounts refer to the same people experiencing the same event. You may have noticed that I put quotes around the name “Mary” in the first paragraph. The problem is that there are a number of women named Mary in the biblical narrative. Like the name Smith in America today, Mary was the most common female name in the first century. We have Mary the Mother of Jesus, Mary Magdalene, Mary the wife of Clopas and these different women and their friends came to the tomb at different times and had different experiences. The sequence of events is easy to construct and can only be seen as contradictory if you are unreasonable with what happened and how many people were involved.

Another classic example seen on many atheist Web sites is the fig tree incident of Matthew 21 and Mark 11. Matthew 21:12-19 says that Jesus cursed the fig tree after cleansing the temple. Mark 11:12-14 and 20-24 claims He cursed the fig tree before cleansing the temple. The problem in this case is that Jesus made two visits into Jerusalem, but Matthew skipped the first visit. Both Matthew 21:1-9 and Mark 11:1-11 tell us that Jesus entered Jerusalem. Mark tells us in verse 11 that Jesus entered the temple the first time but did nothing. In verses 11 and 12 Mark tells us that Jesus went back to Bethany. On the way back to Bethany Jesus curses the fig tree recorded in the Mark verses 13-14. None of this is recorded by Matthew who was not concerned with an uneventful visit to the temple.

In both Matthew 21:12-14 and Mark 11:15-17, Jesus enters the city and cleanses the temple, overturning the money changers. In verse 17 of Matthew and verse 19 of Mark He leaves the city the second time. The third time into the city is recorded in verses 18-20 of Matthew and verses 20-21 of Mark and the tree has shriveled in 24 hours. The next lesson is the mountain moving lesson in verse 21 of Matthew and verse 23 of Mark. The flow of events is pretty clear when you read all the verses involved, and the sequence of events makes good sense.

There are multiple examples of sequences of events that make claimed contradictions disappear. A simple example is the claimed contradiction between Matthew 27:44 and Luke 23:39. Matthew says that both robbers reviled Christ, but Luke says that one believed in Jesus. Are the two descriptions describing the same time in the crucifixion process? Reading the passage makes it pretty clear that the robbers were together at the start of the crucifixion, but near the end, one repented and came to believe that Jesus was the Christ. Another example, Song of Solomon 6:8, says that Solomon had 140 wives and concubines while 1 Kings 11:3 says he had 1,000. These two verses refer to different times in Solomon’s life and in fact, Song of Solomon tells us he had unnumbered “virgins” which undoubtedly referred to wives or concubines in waiting. Not looking at the sequence of events can be a factor in everything from forensics to resumes, and certainly applies to the Bible.

SOME THINGS ARE ALLOWED BY GOD THAT ARE NOT COMMANDED BY GOD. One interesting property of human beings is that they frequently want severe judgment on others, but do not want the same kind of judgment on themselves. God does not operate that way, and critics of the Bible seem to struggle with that. A good example of this is the polygamy of the Old Testament. God’s plan for marriage from the very beginning was one man, one woman for life. The whole concept of marriage is missed by the media and a majority of people in the modern world. Commitment and a true oneness that God designed cannot be fitted into the “survival of the fittest” mentality. In Genesis 2:21-25 God spends an entire chapter of His Word explaining the relationship that He wants man and woman to have. “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife and they shall be one flesh” (verse 24). The oneness is not just a sexual union, but a helping, supporting relationship where each esteems the other higher than himself or herself. A unity in purpose and function brings them joy and fulfillment in all they do. Jesus emphasizes all of this strongly in Matthew 19:1-12. The qualifications of church leaders called bishops and deacons in 1 Timothy 3:2, 12 was that they only have one wife. God never commands or sanctions polygamy.

If that is true, why does God not strike down the first polygamous relationship which is in Genesis 4:19-26? God commands the Israelites in Deuteronomy 17:17 not to have multiple wives, and in 1 Kings 11:1-9 we see God’s warnings and the fulfillment of those warnings. The point here is that God is very patient with His chosen people in spite of what Jesus calls “the hardness of your hearts” (Matthew 19:8 and Mark 10:5). God tolerates individual destructive behavior to allow mankind a chance to rectify and even experience the consequences of that behavior. One cannot help but marvel at God’s tolerance of Samson’s sexual affairs in Judges 14-16, but even the rankest atheist realizes that God’s patience with Samson did not mean He approved multiple visits to prostitutes.

REPORTING HISTORY DOES NOT MEAN CAUSING HISTORY. Much of the cruelty and abuse that is seen in the Bible is objective reporting of what happened–not what God did. A classic example of the horrible story of a concubine who was gang raped and left dead at the door of the home where her “husband” was staying (see Judges 19:22-30). He cuts up her body into parts and sends them to the various tribes that he wants to support him in avenging her horrible treatment. The story is horrid and tragic and should turn the stomach of any thinking Christian, but none of the events described were commanded by God! This is history, and the old idea of “don’t shoot the messenger” certainly has to apply here.

Another example is the view of Jepthah recorded in Judges 11:30-40. This is a case where a man makes a vow to God not commanded by God. The point of the story is that we should not make emotional promises. What happens in this story is that Jepthah vows to sacrifice the first thing that comes to him when he returns home from battle if God will help him win that battle. The first thing that comes to him is his daughter. There is considerable evidence, and in fact almost certainty, that he was not to murder his daughter because that would violate God’s commandment (see Deuteronomy 12:31; 18:10; Leviticus 18:21; 20:2-5). The daughter also grieves her never being able to marry, not her death. The point here, however, is that this is not a commandment of God that is being discussed, but the folly of a man who makes a rash, human promise.

CULTURAL CONSIDERATIONS ELIMINATE MANY CLAIMED ERRORS. By far the most common error made by those trying to find mistakes in the Bible is to assume that the Bible is an American book written to Americans by Americans. (You could substitute English, German, Russian, etc., in that sentence.) Even within the books of the Bible it is important to look at who is writing and to whom. A classic example of this is the difference between the genealogies of Matthew and Luke. Many people do not seem to understand that one of the reasons for there being four gospels is to address the needs of the different cultures that existed at the time of their writing. Matthew is a Jewish writer writing for a Jewish readership. Luke is a Greek writer writing for a Gentile readership.

This is really evident in the genealogies of Christ from Abraham to Jesus where Matthew uses Jewish symbols and numbers. Seven and its multiples indicate levels of completeness to a Jewish reader, so Matthew (1:1-17) uses three sets of 14 to indicate the completeness of God’s plan to send His Son. This adds up to 42, which is not the point that Matthew is making. He even leaves out major characters in his listing, such as Joash. Luke (3:23-38) on the other hand is writing from a Greek perspective and has no such symbol, so his genealogy adds up to 55.

Another example is the time of Jesus’ crucifixion. Mark 15:25 says Jesus was crucified at the third hour, while John 19:14 says it was the sixth hour. Mark is using the Jewish time scale and John is using the Roman scale, and they are referring to two different events in the trial/crucifixion sequence.

Another example is the question of how long Jesus was going to be in the tomb. Matthew 12:40 clearly states that it would be three days and three nights. If Jesus was crucified on Friday, the best you can do is three days and two nights. The problem here is that there were many kinds of Sabbaths (which just means “to cease from work”). The seventh-day Sabbath is the one we are most familiar with, but there were many other special days when a Sabbath was declared (see Leviticus 23:4-8; Exodus 12). John 19:31 indicates that one of these special Sabbaths was taking place when Jesus was crucified. This was almost certainly a 48-hour Sabbath, meaning that Jesus was crucified on Thursday. One of our consultants, Wayne Leeper, has a detailed treatment of this topic in his book titled Prelude to Glory (which can be borrowed from us, see our address on the Contact Us page of this Web site).

The final example that I would like to explore briefly which is a cultural problem, is the issue of slavery. In this case we are not dealing with a Bible contradiction or mistake, but the question of how God could tolerate slavery and in fact, give rules that would seem to sustain it. Thinking Christian people especially have to abhor any enslavement of a human being. In our twenty-first century culture any notion of a human owning another human is beyond comprehension. In the Old Testament in addition to military enslavement, slaves could be purchased (Genesis 17:12,13,27; 37:36; 39:1; Leviticus 25:44 ff), acquired by restitution (Exodus 22:3), acquired by the paying of a debt (Exodus 21:2-11, Deuteronomy 15:12-18), or self-sold for security (Lev 25:39-43). How can a God of love, justice, kindness, and fairness allow this?

Once again we need to remember that this was not twenty-first century America. This was a primitive people who were always on the edge of extinction. What did they do when life caved in on them? There were no churches or shelters to run to nor any benevolent societies who would take care of them. These alternatives are a part of the New Testament, and have no connection to primitive people living in a harsh land. If someone will take them in, feed them, provide a place for them to live, and protect them, it is a positive alternative. Did slave owners abuse it? Man is capable of abusing everything. Slave owners who had no rules or higher power to control what they did, caused some horrible misery in other humans. God’s rules blunted that, but in the Old Testament slavery was not the ultimate evil and having a kind and just slave owner was a blessing.

When Jesus appeared on the scene, He introduced a system that struck at the roots of slavery. Jesus did not create mass chaos by immediately overthrowing slavery, but you cannot read John 13:4-17 without seeing that slavery did not fit into this teaching. In Galatians 3:26-29 the equality of all men and women is taught and further emphasized in Ephesians 6:5-9, Colossians 3:22-4:1, and 1 Corinthians 7:21-24. At the end of the New Testament we see Paul writing to a slave owner named Philemon who had a runaway slave returned to him. The message is warm, forgiving, and unifying. It eliminates the traditional concept of slavery. God’s method of removing this horrible vice was to teach it away, unifying all of humanity in a gospel of love and forgiveness. When evolution came on the scene and men had a scientific basis of trying to teach that one race was more able to survive because it was more fit, slavery had an intellectual rebirth. The fact is that slavery is incompatible with any of the teachings of Christ, but is not incompatible with some interpretations of organic evolution.

Our purpose in this discussion has been to establish methods of approaching challenges to the integrity of the Bible. The number of examples that can be given are huge, but these six are general helps that can answer most challenges skeptics raise.      –John N. Clayton

This has been a word for word copy of an article (excluding pictures) by one of my most dedicated brothers in Christ,  John N Clayton, www.doesgodexist.org as seen in the latest  edition of the  journal, ‘Does God Exist?’  July/August 2009.  This free  bimonthly journal is part of a program of service titled Does God Exist? The purpose of the program is to provide thinking, seeking people with scientific evidence that God does exist and that the Bible is His Word.  It is our conviction that all men can logically and rationally believe in God.  It is a nonprofit effort to convince mankind that God is real and the Bible is His Word.   –dc